Goto

Collaborating Authors

 unconditional generator


Semantic Image Synthesis with Unconditional Generator

Neural Information Processing Systems

Semantic image synthesis (SIS) aims to generate realistic images according to semantic masks given by a user. Although recent methods produce high quality results with fine spatial control, SIS requires expensive pixel-level annotation of the training images. On the other hand, manipulating intermediate feature maps in a pretrained unconditional generator such as StyleGAN supports coarse spatial control without heavy annotation. In this paper, we introduce a new approach, for reflecting user's detailed guiding masks on a pretrained unconditional generator. Our method converts a user's guiding mask to a proxy mask through a semantic mapper.


Improved Input Reprogramming for GAN Conditioning

Dinh, Tuan, Seo, Daewon, Du, Zhixu, Shang, Liang, Lee, Kangwook

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

We study the GAN conditioning problem, whose goal is to convert a pretrained unconditional GAN into a conditional GAN using labeled data. We first identify and analyze three approaches to this problem -- conditional GAN training from scratch, fine-tuning, and input reprogramming. Our analysis reveals that when the amount of labeled data is small, input reprogramming performs the best. Motivated by real-world scenarios with scarce labeled data, we focus on the input reprogramming approach and carefully analyze the existing algorithm. After identifying a few critical issues of the previous input reprogramming approach, we propose a new algorithm called InRep+. Our algorithm InRep+ addresses the existing issues with the novel uses of invertible neural networks and Positive-Unlabeled (PU) learning. Via extensive experiments, we show that InRep+ outperforms all existing methods, particularly when label information is scarce, noisy, and/or imbalanced. For instance, for the task of conditioning a CIFAR10 GAN with 1% labeled data, InRep+ achieves an average Intra-FID of 82.13, whereas the second-best method achieves 114.51.